9th International Inter University Scientific Meeting
Academy of Studenica
CLINICAL PROBLEMS IN COLORECTAL CANCER &
ARCHEOLOGY AND MEDICINE


Organizer: Institute of Oncology Sremska Kamenica, Serbia and Montenegro
President: Prof.Dr. Vladimir Vit. Baltiæ Vice-presidents:
Prof. Dr Milan Breberina, Prof. Dr. Zoran Krivokapiæ
ISSN 1450-708

Content
6 /2003
 
EFFECTS AND TOXICITY OF COMBINATION VS. SEQUENTIAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN COLORECTAL CANCER: IS THERE STILL A ROLE OF 5-FUL/LV MONOTHERAPY?
Popov I.
Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
 
  ABSTRACT
As the number of active drugs for colorectal cancer increases, we continually revisit the question of how best to integrate them. Ideally we should base our decisions on the results of clinical trials but unfortunately these can only explore a limited number of options. Hence, we need to test not only specific regimens but also principles, the latter serving to guide our use of drugs even when the specific approach may have not been tested. Traditionally, medical oncologists have made strides by empirically combining the available chemotherapy agents into treatment regimens. These regimens are generally associated with increased response proportion in comparison to single agent administration but the usual price is an increase in acute toxicity. Importantly, these heightened response proportions only occasionally lead to improved time to progression or overall survival. In addition, it is increasingly clear that quality of life, the immediate goal of palliative therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, may be better with single agent regimens as compared to combinations. Aim: We investigated whether sequential chemotherapy, which consists of only bolus plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, could be comparable concerning overall survival to sequential chemotherapy that consists of bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, plus "new-generation" drugs like CPT-11 or oxaliplatin. Patients with histologically verified locally advanced disease and/or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, without possibility for surgical resection, were eligible for the study. Treatments: Cohort A - Mayo Clinic Regimen (MCR) in first line, "de Gramont" regimen in second line; Cohort B - MCR in first line, CPT-11 (350mg/m2) in second line; Cohort C - MCR in first line, oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) plus "de Gramont" regimen in second line. Total of 89 patients received first plus second line chemotherapy and all of them have been analyzed for survival. Number of patients/cohort: A-32 B-27; C-30. The median survival time of the patients was 15, 11, and 17 months for the patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Survival of the patients in cohort C was significantly better than survival of the patients in cohort B (log-rank test, p=0.04). There was not a significant difference in overall survival between the cohorts A vs. C (log-rank test, p=0.52) and B vs. C (log-rank test, p=0.27). It is conceivable that infusional HD 5-FU could serve as a basis for first and second-line protocols in which other drugs are added to this regimen. Infusional 5-FU plus oxaliplatin in sequential pattern of application after bolus 5-FU has the best overall survival in comparison to other cohorts. CPT-11 applied as a single drug, was not effective enough in comparison to other treatment options.
-
  Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Sequential chemotherapy, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11, Infusional 5-fluorouracil  
© Academy of Studenica, 2003