8th International Inter University Scientific Meeting
Academy of Studenica
NEW TRENDS IN DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPY OF MALIGNANT TUMORS
Organizer: Institute of Oncology Sremska Kamenica, Yugoslavia
Co-organizers:
Institute for Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Yugoslavia;
"Aristotel School", Thessaloniki, Greece
President: Prof.Dr. Vladimir Vit. Baltić
ISSN 1450-708

Content
5 /2001
 
SULFINOSINE - THE NEW POTENTIALS IN TREATMENT OF LUNG CANCER
M. Pešić, J. Milošević, S. Kanazir, Lj. Medić-Mijačević, Lj. Rakić, S. Ruždijić
Institute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković", Department of Neurobiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Beograd, Yugoslavia
 
  ABSTRACT
The search for successful anticancer agents has been ongoing for decades. It is very difficult to obtain a particular agent with all desirable properties that would characterize it as successful chemotherapeutics. Hoping to obtain compound less toxic to host cells and more effective for anticancer therapy, the chemists have synthesized sulfinosine (2-amino-9-ß-D-ribofuranosylpurine-6-sulfinamide). There are evidences that suggest specific mechanism of sulfinosine (SF) action. SF has the ability for binding glutathione and decreasing its concentration in target cells. Consequently the actions of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione-peroxidase (GPX) are inhibited. The ability of cancer cells for cellular detoxification is diminished and they become vulnerable for action of other cytotoxic drugs. In accordance with its mechanism of action, SF could sensitize resistant cancer cells to standard chemotherapeutics. We have studied the potential effects of SF on cell growth and proliferation, as well as on cell cycle and cell death in vitro. Human non-small cell lung carcinoma cells (NSCLC) and small cell lung carcinoma cells (SCLC) were used as biological models for SF action. SF has demonstrated a dose dependent inhibition of NSCLC and SCLC cell growth and proliferation with IC50 values between 3.6 and 6.3 µM. Also, SF has caused typical DNA laddering, a hallmark for apoptosis. The formation of free nucleosomes, as well as, enzymatic labeling of fragmented DNA has confirmed apoptosis involvement in SF action. In addition, flow-cytometric analysis has showed the arrest in cell cycle progression at the G2M phase and induction of apoptosis in both cell lines treated with SF. In order to study the SF potential in reverting resistant phenotype, further investigations were focused on the induction of resistant NSCLC subline by repeated treatment with doxorubicin (Dox). The established Dox-resistant NSCLC cells have showed 5-fold increase in IC50 value in comparison with parental cells. Also, the expression of mdr1 (encoding P-glicoprotein) and lrp (encoding lung-resistance-associated protein) genes was evident in Dox-resistant, but not in parental cells. Considering the suggested mechanism of SF action, we expect to sensitize Dox-resistant cells for Dox treatment with the administration of low concentrations of SF that should not impact cell growth. Obtained results have shown that the biological effects of SF may be due to modulation of cell growth, cell death, and cell cycle. Further, we have established a biological model suitable for revealing the potential of SF in reverting resistant phenotype.
 
  Keywords: Sulfinosine: Lung cancer: Cell growth: Apoptosis: Cell cycle: Drug resistance  
© Academy of Studenica, 2002